Page 10 of 28 FirstFirst 1234567891011121314151617181920 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 280

Thread: Burkha ban

  1. #91
    Certified Troll
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Barnsley, Jakarta
    Posts
    5,942

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gffgold View Post
    Fred, you are living in the past. You don't need to 'invade' a country to attack its citizens and you certainly don't need the backing of your own country to do it. Countries invading other countries just doesn't work anymore. Those who have tried it recently have invariably come unstuck.
    True. US drone attacks on Pakistani soil.

  2. #92
    Certified Troll
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Barnsley, Jakarta
    Posts
    5,942

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kratos View Post
    Dont know whether the issue of Burqa Ban is still relevant up until this page this far.
    I believe the ban is a cheap political shot at an enemy that is manufactured. There have been zero attacks in Europe by Muslim wearing burkha and very few by Muslims at all. Western political forces have been behind hundreds of European attacks but the Irish, Basque and so on are all white and look like us. A lot harder to create an enemy from those groups.
    The US was funding the IRA for much of it's murderous bombing but that has been forgotten now there is a war on terror as has US funding of Cuban terror groups.

  3. #93
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Pondok Cabe
    Posts
    908

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mas Fred View Post
    I asked for Muslim on non Muslim but I'll go with that and raise you CIA or other US involvement in as many countries as you like.
    CIA in Indonesia, Laos, Thailand, and pretty much every other country in the world. Extraordinary rendition and general US attacks/invasions of other countries starting with Canada in 1812 and Hawaii in 1893.
    Got their arse kicked in 1812 , we burnt the White house down, true they were a bit naughty in Hawaii too, but were friends now ,I hope, they probably learned from us, but we dont have Much of an Army, Airforce or Navy left now, if the Germans or French wanted to invade now it would be a good time, all the Army is in some 12th centry country fighting for nobody in particular, the locals would like to see us go, they rember the last time we were there

  4. #94
    Member lantern's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Jakarta
    Posts
    3,497

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mas Fred View Post
    And the vast majority of Israeli land actually belongs to?

    Israel invades Gaza. 2009
    Israel Lebanon 1982.
    Israel Lebanon 1978.

    Right there goes your three and I raise you:

    Gaza and Lebanon 2006 and I'll toss in Syria 2007

    So how about western countries?
    As I mentioned in my previous post to invade a country you need a powerful military. It's a bit like saying why does America invade countries when New Zealand has never done such a thing.

  5. #95
    Certified Troll
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Indonesia
    Posts
    4,406

    Default

    Ahhhhh, Canada became Canada in 1867 Fred. It was an English colony prior to that.

  6. #96
    Certified Troll
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Indonesia
    Posts
    4,406

    Default

    No, don't make them stop female circumcision mutilation. That would be a prejudiced act. It is part of their culture and they should have the right to do that.

  7. #97
    Certified Troll
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Barnsley, Jakarta
    Posts
    5,942

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pimpin View Post
    Ahhhhh, Canada became Canada in 1867 Fred. It was an English colony prior to that.
    I knew someone would come up with that so, before you go further, google "war plan orange" and "war plan red".

    Just as a note, in 1812 the US invasion plans assumed the invading forces would be welcomed as liberators.
    Didn't that line get used in Iraq as well?

  8. #98
    Certified Troll
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Barnsley, Jakarta
    Posts
    5,942

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lantern View Post
    As I mentioned in my previous post to invade a country you need a powerful military. It's a bit like saying why does America invade countries when New Zealand has never done such a thing.
    So having a powerful military makes invasion OK?

  9. #99
    Certified Troll
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Indonesia
    Posts
    4,406

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mas Fred View Post
    I knew someone would come up with that so, before you go further, google "war plan orange" and "war plan red".

    Just as a note, in 1812 the US invasion plans assumed the invading forces would be welcomed as liberators.
    Didn't that line get used in Iraq as well?
    I just did and don't see your point. What I saw when I did had to do with history way beyond 1812. No matter what it is you are pointing too let me know here please.

    Yes true and there were some who did welcome the invasion but I would say they were in the minority. Yes again they claimed that in Iraq and were met with thousands who welcomed them. I have no idea the percentage of who welcomed them and who didn't. I would say the fighters mostly from other countries after the fall of Sadam were the majority who did not. I doubt those fighters are welcome by so many now or for a long time.

  10. #100
    Member lantern's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Jakarta
    Posts
    3,497

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mas Fred View Post
    So having a powerful military makes invasion OK?
    No. But I think a lot more Muslim countries would be throwing their weight around if the could. Wiping Israel off the map would be top of the agenda for some.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •