Rushing Doll and Anglian got the spirit in which I wrote. I was trying to interject humor into your failed attempt at it. That trick to draw viewers is old and worn on forums. If I was attempting to flame you Om there are plenty of better posts in the past you have written that would have been my target. Reading several of your posts I get the ideas I would reply with, see they are negative and flaming, shake my head and resist the temptation. The struggle will be ongoing no doubt.
I would never suggest one smokes weed because of the ill effects it must have on lungs but since seeing how tight you can be wound up may I suggest you consider a recepie I posted in the thread re: hookahs? I'm sure you know the calming effects it has on its subjects.
That is one take on the lack of replies to your post. Another could be they didn't see the show on orangutans and then couldn't be bothered to reply to a post using a goofy tactic. Most probably had "waste of time to open" in their minds and quickly exited the thread on to greener pastures of info, intrigue and humour. Btw note I am the only person thus far to have commented directly regarding seeing that doc so your "experiment" worked on two levels for me. Congratulations. Did you really need to do that "experiment" to find out if many would click on a post with such a title? As if you didn't know what the outcome was going to be. Come come now. Looks more like a little mental masturbation than intended science. Your later posts clearly exhibited your joy (orgasm) of what the known-to-you outcome was going to be. There is one good thing to come out of this. You won't need to repeat this "humorous" "experiment" again unless your years of partying result in you forgetting you already proved the point you knew you would.
Your reactions to my reply is much more amusing than your first, what, five posts in this thread. +1 rep point for you Om Freud. Now eat and chill. Sweet daydreams.
Pervert or not? You skirted answering that question.





Reply With Quote




Bookmarks